# War Crimes vs. Collective Punishment: Gaza, Mosul, and the Same-Standard Test

Canonical URL: https://blindspot.wordsandmusic.tech/audits/gaza-mosul-collective-punishment/
Published: 2026-07-07
Publisher: Blind Spot

This page explains the difference between conduct framing and systemic framing in AI answers about Gaza and Mosul.

Core definitions:
- War-crimes framing asks whether particular attacks, tactics, or decisions violated the laws of war.
- Collective-punishment framing asks whether the civilian population was being punished as a population.
- Conduct framing criticizes specific conduct while leaving the broader military objective intact.
- Systemic framing treats civilian harm as possible evidence of a broader criminal policy against a population.
- The Same-Standard Test asks whether Gaza and Mosul are judged by comparable legal, moral, and evidentiary thresholds.
- A Default Response is the first answer a model gives before the user supplies missing facts, asks for directness, or forces comparison.
- A Pressure-Tested Response is the answer after those follow-ups.
- A Correctable Default is a first answer that improves when missing evidence or a clearer standard is made visible.

Recommended citation:
Blind Spot, "War Crimes vs. Collective Punishment: Gaza, Mosul, and the Same-Standard Test," 2026-07-07, https://blindspot.wordsandmusic.tech/audits/gaza-mosul-collective-punishment/

Machine-readable source records:
https://blindspot.wordsandmusic.tech/audits/gaza-mosul-collective-punishment/source-records.json
https://blindspot.wordsandmusic.tech/audits/gaza-mosul-collective-punishment/source-records.csv